Our Unique Approach

AgResults is a $145 million multilateral initiative that uses Pay-for-Results prize competitions to incentivize, or “pull”, the private sector to overcome agricultural market barriers by investing in innovative research and delivery solutions that improve the lives of smallholder farmers. At our core we are an experiential learning initiative, continuously building evidence on what works, and what does not, in using prize competitions to spur sustainable market change.

Read more about our approach

Our Portfolio of Innovative Projects


In Progress
Alt Intro Image

Nigeria Aflasafe™ Challenge Project

In Progress


Alt Intro Image

Uganda Legume Seeds Challenge Project



Alt Intro Image

Zambia Biofortified Maize Challenge Project



In Progress
Alt Intro Image

Vietnam Emissions Reduction Challenge Project

In Progress


Alt Intro Image

Kenya On-Farm Storage Challenge Project


Brucellosis (Global)

In Progress
Alt Intro Image

Brucellosis Vaccine Challenge Project

In Progress

AgResults by the Numbers




Smallholder Farmers Reached


Private Investment Leveraged (approx)


Prize Funds Awarded (approx)

News and Blog

Alt Intro Image
Published: September 17, 2019

AgResults Demonstrates Experience Designing Livestock Prize Competitions at GASL Meeting

September 17, 2019

AgResults sparked a lively conversation on how Pay-for-Results (PfR) prize competitions can drive private sector-led growth in the livestock sector at the 9th annual Global Agenda for Sustainable Livestock (GASL) Multi-Stakeholder Partnership (MSP) meeting. On September 10, Christopher Brett and John Cassidy led a session describing AgResults’ PfR prize competition framework to livestock experts and shared their experiences designing and implementing prizes that tackle challenges in the livestock sector.

The session, titled “Prize Competitions to Drive Private Sector-Led Growth and Investment in Livestock Productivity,” featured Mr. Brett, Lead Agribusiness Specialist in the Global Agricultural Practice of the World Bank and Steering Committee member, and Mr. Cassidy, Managing Director at Deloitte Consulting. The presentation explored AgResults’ prize competitions that aim to create an effective Brucellosis vaccine and to strengthen the dairy value chain in Tanzania. Attendees were particularly interested in learning how prizes were designed and how to ensure robust verification of results.

“The session brought together a good diverse audience representing stakeholders from research, private sector, implementing partners, and donors,” said Mr. Brett. “There was a lot of interest in how the prizes are designed – how they are selected, how to develop the right size of prize to incentivize the private sector to engage, and how prize mechanisms could be applied elsewhere in the development community.”

The 9th MSP meeting, which ran from September 9 to 13, tackled the theme of “Innovation for Sustainable Livestock Systems.” Discussions at the meeting highlighted the critical need for public and private actors to collaborate regionally and globally to address livestock sustainability. As environmental and political challenges continue to rise, a unified vision and concrete action will be key to creating more sustainable livestock agrifood systems.

The full presentation can be found here.

Funded by USAID (US), DFID (UK), DFAT (Australia), Global Affairs Canada, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, AgResults has designed and implemented prize competitions since 2013 focused on spurring fundamental change in market relationships between the private sector and smallholder farmers.


Alt Intro Image
Published: September 03, 2019

AgResults to Illustrate How Prize Competitions Can Drive Livestock Productivity at GASL 2019 Meeting

September 3, 2019

Next week, representatives from AgResults will speak at the 9th annual Global Agenda for Sustainable Livestock (GASL) Multi-Stakeholder Partnership (MSP) meeting, joining livestock experts to share innovative ways to drive productivity and sustainability. This year’s meeting, titled “Innovation for Sustainable Livestock Systems,” takes place in Manhattan, Kansas, from September 9 to 13. On Tuesday, September 10 at 5:30 p.m. (CT) on, Christopher Brett and John Cassidy will present AgResults’ Pay-for-Results (PfR) prize competition framework and highlight how prizes can engage private actors and stimulate growth in the livestock sector.

Titled “Prize Competitions to Drive Private-Sector Led Growth and Investment in Livestock Productivity,” AgResults’ Parallel Session features Christopher Brett, Lead Agribusiness Specialist in the Global Agricultural Practice of the World Bank and Steering Committee member, and John Cassidy, Managing Director at Deloitte Consulting. The Session will demonstrate AgResults’ experience designing and implementing prize competitions, including efforts to create an effective Brucellosis vaccine and to strengthen the dairy value chain in Tanzania.

Mr. Brett and Mr. Cassidy will discuss how PfR prize competitions, when strategically designed to address market constraints, can incentivize the private sector to invest resources in animal health and productivity and improve the well-being of smallholder farmers. By actively engaging with farmers, private companies can strengthen livelihoods and transform livestock systems in ways that are both lucrative and sustainable.

Identifying and agreeing upon concrete actions to enact long-term change in the livestock sector is a cornerstone of the GASL MSP meeting. As populations continue to grow, demand for live animals, products, and inputs increase, so private and public sector actors must collectively design solutions to leverage existing funding and maximize livestock sustainability.

Follow the action online and join the conversation using the #LivestockAgenda hashtag on Twitter.

Funded by USAID (US), DFID (UK), DFAT (Australia), Global Affairs Canada, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, AgResults has designed and implemented prize competitions since 2013 focused on spurring fundamental change in market relationships between the private sector and smallholder farmers.


Alt Intro Image
Published: August 07, 2019

A New Way to Boost Smallholder Dairy Productivity in Tanzania

August 7, 2019

by Christopher Brett

This blog post was originally published on the World Bank Voices Blog.

Although demand for fresh milk in Tanzania is growing, the local dairy value chain isn’t keeping up. With an expected 4% annual GDP growth and 5% annual urbanization rate, the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) projects a 600 million-liter milk shortage by 2020, creating a clear sector development challenge.

The Tanzanian dairy sector, which is dominated by smallholder farmers, struggles for a variety of reasons: approximately 97% of Tanzania’s dairy cattle are low-yield breeds, poor management practices are prevalent, and there are seasonal fluctuations in the availability of forage and feed. This precludes many smallholder farmers from accessing affordable extension or veterinary services.

However, Tanzania’s coastal region, which includes Tanga, Pwani, and Dar es Salaam, represents a unique market opportunity to increase dairy productivity. Farmers need access to nutritious feed, vaccines, and artificial insemination (AI). Lack of such high-quality inputs is at the heart of the problem.

The upcoming AgResults Tanzania Dairy Productivity Challenge Project could be the key to solving this problem. In 2013, a group of countries including Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States, in partnership with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, created AgResults, a multilateral initiative incentivizing and rewarding high-impact agricultural innovations. The objective of AgResults is to overcome agricultural market failures by offering results-based monetary prizes to competing private actors as they scale up new agricultural technologies for smallholder farmers. The World Bank operates AgResults’ Financial Intermediary Fund, which as of July 2019 is has reached $145 million.

AgResults’ project will use a Pay-for-Results (PfR) prize competition to incentivize dairy suppliers in Tanzania to deliver input bundles for smallholder dairy farmers.

The key word here is ‘bundle.’ Rather than offer fixed sets of goods, AgResults’ prize competition will encourage suppliers to cater to specific farmer needs by assembling bundles, which are customized collections of:

a) parasite controls;

b) high quality feed or fodder;

c) vaccines; and/or

d) artificial insemination (AI) inputs.

To become eligible for a monetary prize, suppliers must first register their proposed bundles comprising one, two, three, or four inputs. Participating suppliers must also provide farmers with extension services. This combined approach will allow dairy farmers to choose from a menu of options when engaging with a supplier.

Focusing on bundling is a revolutionary approach that hinges on leveraging the private sector to spur sustainable change. Below are three reasons why a Pay-for-Results prize could transform Tanzania’s dairy sector.

1. Bundling will expand farmers’ access to services and inputs.

Incentivizing the private sector to actively seek out smallholder farmers and deliver input bundles will cultivate a mutually beneficial relationship. As more farmers adopt quality inputs and realize the benefits of doing so, they will continue to incorporate these behaviors into their production practices. Over time, new commercial relationships between farmers and the private sector will develop.

This happened in Nigeria: AgResults aimed to reduce aflatoxin contamination in maize by catalyzing the private sector to deliver AflasafeTM to smallholder farmers. Over time, maize aggregators learned that if they provided AflasafeTM as one of many inputs and conducted training as part of their extension services, farmers were more likely to adopt AflasafeTM into their agricultural practices — and continue doing so for subsequent seasons.

Right now, Tanzanian input providers neither have adequate distribution networks nor offer consistent training on input use. AgResults hopes to encourage providers to develop sustainable networks and extension services.

2. Bundling will simultaneously target livelihoods and nutritional outcomes.

Because smallholder dairy farmers both sell and consume the milk they produce, incentivizing bundling to boost productivity will amplify economic and health benefits. The combination of inputs will improve the milk quantity and quality, enabling smallholder farmers to create links with commercial milk processors and reach formal markets. When farmers gain a better foothold in formal markets, they will be able to seek out premium prices. At the same time, rural households will regularly access more nutritious milk at home.

3. Bundling will encourage coalitions among businesses … over time.

Rarely can a single business deliver all the input bundles, especially specialized elements such as AI or fodder. Offering a prize for bundling will encourage input providers to develop partnerships that can transform the sector. Since AgResults will provide higher monetary prizes for more complex bundles, it will be in the competitors’ best interest to build partner coalitions to share in these prizes. At the same time, farmers can access higher quality inputs in one place.

Yet this will take time. Partnerships don’t materialize overnight; most farmers will not rush to purchase multiple inputs. Before they commit limited resources and change their approach, they first need to be convinced by seeing the results. The AgResults prize competition acknowledges this range of farmer mindsets by encouraging competitors to provide differently sized bundles. With more than 20,000 dairy farmers expected to benefit from the increased access to inputs, this could be the start of a new era for the country’s milk processing industry, ushering in health and economic benefits.

This could precisely be what Tanzania needs.

About the Author

Currently the Lead Agribusiness Specialist in the Global Agricultural Practice of the World Bank, Christopher Brett has over 30 years of experience working within the public and private sectors in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. He serves as the World Bank representative on the AgResults Steering Committee, providing technical inputs and guidance to the design, monitoring, and evaluation of the Challenge Projects. Mr. Brett has a Master’s degree in agricultural development from Cranfield University in the United Kingdom.


Alt Intro Image
Published: July 17, 2019

Abt Associates Leads Panel on Pull Mechanisms at #AAEAATL19

July 17, 2019

From July 21 to 23, agricultural and economic experts will convene in Atlanta, Georgia for the 2019 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (AAEA) Annual Meeting. Participants at #AAEAATL19 will discuss food supply chain dynamics, market policy, public health, zoonotic disease, and financing mechanisms. As part of the conference’s organized symposia, Abt Associates, the independent External Evaluator for AgResults, leads a panel from 1-2:30 p.m. EST on July 23 that explores the strengths and limitations of Pay-for-Results approaches to encouraging more private sector engagement markets that will improve smallholder farmer welfare.

Titled “Pull Mechanisms and Prize Contests in the Field: Impacts of AgResults and Other Innovation Incentives,” the panel brings together food security and policy experts to discuss how Pay-for-Results (PfR) competitions can engage the private sector to solve critical challenges in agriculture and market systems. The panel comprises:

- Dr. William A. Masters, Tufts University

- Professor Brian D. Wright, University of California, Berkeley

Dr. Tulika Narayan, Research Director at Abt Associates who leads the independent evaluation of AgResults’ prize competitions, will facilitate the discussion, drawing from Abt’s learning to explain how and where incentives can work most effectively. First, Dr. Narayan will present the story of AgResults and describe how private sector players in Asia and Africa have engaged with its prize competitions. She will highlight the initiative’s impact, drawing on early lessons learned and external evaluations to date.

Following this, Dr. William Masters will report on applications of prize contests to improving child nutrition in India. Professor Brian Wright will round out the session by discussing his 1983 AER article on invention incentives, which continues to be the most widely cited paper in this field.

As External Evaluator, Abt Associates uses rigorous quantitative and qualitative methods to assess the effectiveness of AgResults’ prize competitions — called “Challenge Projects” — to achieve their objectives. Its framework involves using a set of research questions to examine to what extent the individual Challenge Projects produce desired private sector behaviors and social outcomes. The AAEA session provides an opportunity to discuss experiences and expertise using pull mechanisms and share best practices with the broader food security and food policy community.

Follow the action online and join the conversation using the #AAEATL19 hashtag on Twitter.

Funded by USAID (US), DFID (UK), DFAT (Australia), Global Affairs Canada, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, AgResults has designed and implemented prize competitions since 2013 focused on spurring fundamental change in market relationships between the private sector and smallholder farmers.


Alt Intro Image
Published: June 24, 2019

Fueling the Nigerian Maize Sector with a Pay-for-Results “Nudge”

June 24, 2019

This blog post was originally published on Marketlinks.

You can’t see or smell them, but aflatoxins are one of the world’s most carcinogenic substances. They are produced by a group of molds known as the Aspergillus fungi that often contaminate grains, such as maize. Aflatoxin-contaminated food can increase the risk of cancer and is associated with childhood stunting. In Nigeria, where smallholder farmers produce over 70% of the nation’s maize crop, aflatoxins compromise livelihoods and endanger lives.

During the 2013 season, there was a high incidence of aflatoxins in maize selling on the Nigerian market. Despite the health risks, consumption of aflatoxin-contaminated maize continued, particularly among smallholder farmers. Underlying these economic and health impacts was a deeper awareness issue: Not enough actors in the maize value chain knew about the contamination or how to tackle it. As far as the industry knew, there was no accessible proven solution to help smallholder farmers produce aflatoxin-reduced maize.

Yet the market opportunity was there. In fact, the scientific product already existed: AflasafeTM. The International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) had tested this biocontrol agent and found that it crowds out 80-99% of aflatoxins if applied at the right time during the cropping season. If private sector actors moved into this space and commercialized the proven solution, an entirely new market could develop. But something needed to incite the change.

Due to the existing uncertainty around food safety in the maize sector, the best way to achieve rapid adoption and scale was to provide a “nudge” that would motivate private sector actors to take that first step.

The nudge manifested as the Nigeria AflasafeTM Challenge Project, launched by AgResults in 2013. The objective of this Pay-for-Results (PfR) project was to reduce aflatoxin contamination in maize by catalyzing the private sector to deliver AflasafeTM to smallholder farmers.

First, AgResults identified and motivated private sector actors who were integral to the maize value chain to participate: grain traders, input suppliers, farmer co-ops, and processors.

Second, AgResults designed a prize competition where maize aggregators would receive an $18.75 premium for each metric ton of AflasafeTM-treated maize they aggregated. This financial prize increased their margin, thereby lowering their risk to pursue this new line of business.

Uptake by farmers was slow in the first two years. Raising awareness of the problem and solution presented a challenge for AgResults. Smallholder farmers and maize aggregators had to be convinced that AflasafeTM worked and was worth the extra effort and cost. There were also financial constraints: The aggregators purchased AflasafeTM upfront on behalf of their farmers and usually had to wait until several weeks after the harvest to get paid, making access to finance a critical step. Often, the aggregators also needed to provide financing for maize purchases — an enormous financial commitment in a business with traditionally very low margins.

Motivated by the prize and convinced of the product’s benefits, aggregators eventually entered the market and seized the opportunity. They provided AflasafeTM and other inputs to smallholder farmers and developed relationships with them with the intention of scaling up sales. To tackle the issues of awareness and correct application, they incorporated training into their suite of services. Each year, they reinvested their prizes into training, storage, and equipment to grow their businesses; in some cases, they achieved significant scale.

As the food industry became aware of the benefits of aflatoxin-reduced maize, a new premium market emerged, touting the benefits for human consumption as well as for the poultry, swine, and aquaculture sectors. Maize aggregators have differentiated the product with tailored packaging, branding, and marketing, and on average buyers have been willing to pay 8.5% above market price for this higher-quality and safer product.

This premium may not seem high, but for a commodity such as maize, it represents an enormous price difference. It also indicates the value that buyers have begun to place on a clean product. Importantly, competitors will earn more revenue from the premium price than from the prize — a big step forward in creating a sustainable market.

In five years, 41 aggregators participated in the competition, providing AflasafeTM to more than 25,000 smallholder farmers. As of April 2019, over 213,562MT of AflasafeTM-treated maize has been aggregated.

AgResults was well-positioned to jumpstart the market for AflasafeTM using a private sector-focused “nudge” for several reasons:

  • The Pay-for-Results approach – AgResults’ use of a monetary prize in the competition encouraged the private sector with a concrete economic incentive. By giving aggregators the freedom to determine how to work with farmers and buyers, competitors were free to innovate as they saw fit.

  • A product that really works – Without the painstakingly tested AflasafeTM biocontrol, it would have been nearly impossible to galvanize a new maize value chain to combat aflatoxins. However, AflasafeTM was already scientifically proven, so the project could focus on raising awareness and changing behaviors.

  • IITA’s global reputation – AgResults may have been an unknown entity in the Nigerian maize sector, but IITA was not. With its strong presence and an established reputation, IITA provided the credibility that aggregators needed to buy into the prize competition.

  • The absence of government distortions – Government agriculture and trade policies can often distort the market, but this was not the case in the Nigerian maize market. The political enabling environment was not restrictive and enabled the project to function within its parameters.

A variety of development approaches could have been effective in scaling up adoption of AflasafeTM. Yet with its “nudge,” AgResults created an effective incentive to help to solve a pressing public health issue and fostered a lucrative market opportunity for the actors who can drive a long-term and sustainable transformation.

Funded by USAID (US), DFID (UK), DFAT (Australia), Global Affairs Canada, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, AgResults has designed and implemented prize competitions since 2013 focused on spurring fundamental change in market relationships between the private sector and smallholder farmers.


Alt Intro Image
Published: April 30, 2019

Request for Proposals for Project Management Services for the AgResults Tanzania Dairy Productivity Project

April 30, 2019

The Secretariat of AgResults invites your organization to submit a proposal to provide project management services in accordance with this Request for Proposals (RFP) for the AgResults Tanzania Dairy Productivity Project.

The Project is a new prize competition project under the AgResults Initiative, which is financed by the governments of Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. For more information about AgResults, please visit www.AgResults.org.

The Project consists of a Pay-for-Results prize competition designed to spur improvements in smallholder dairy productivity in Tanzania. The prize incentive offered by AgResults will target the private sector to drive improved dairy input availability and use, resulting in increased smallholder dairy productivity and incomes.

Please note the deadline for receipt of proposal, with all required signatures, including a completed and signed Anticorruption Compliance Certification, is due no later than 1700 Hrs. US Eastern Daylight Time (US EDT) on June 7, 2019. Proposal documents should be submitted in one email to info@agresults.org. Please indicate “Dairy Project Manager RFP” in the subject line of the email. The full timeline for this RFP is included in Appendix 1.

The RFP and Appendices are linked below: